<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E Hub Augmented Science | seanpaul | Activity</title>
	<link>https://e-hub.augmentedscience.eu/members/seanpaul/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://e-hub.augmentedscience.eu/members/seanpaul/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for seanpaul.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 07:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4886e733c98bffe96b60008dd6341653</guid>
				<title>seanpaul started the topic When Does Construction Claims Consulting Actually Make a Difference? in the forum e-Hub Forum</title>
				<link>https://e-hub.augmentedscience.eu/forums/topic/when-does-construction-claims-consulting-actually-make-a-difference/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:14:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been hearing more about <a href="https://boultwoodassociates.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">construction claims consulting</a> being used on projects where delays, variations, and cost issues start building up and I’m trying to understand when it actually becomes useful in practice rather than just being an added layer of input. From what I’ve seen so far, some teams bring consultants in early to help organ&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-172"><a href="https://e-hub.augmentedscience.eu/forums/topic/when-does-construction-claims-consulting-actually-make-a-difference/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>